911±¬ÁÏÍø

XClose

UCL Grand Challenges

Home
Menu

Structurally Unsound

Structurally Unsound - Exploring Inequalities: Igniting research to better inform UK policy Ìý

Structurally Unsound, five years on: how can the UK bridge the equality gap?

Ìý

Structurally UnsoundÌýwas first published in 2019, and took an in-depth look at the causes and consquences of inequality in the UK. Five years since publication, the report's authors ask, is Britain's inequality gap widening, and what can policymakers do to address it?Ìý

Following last month's London Festival of Architecture event "", at which UCL Grand Challenges and UCL Public Policy presented, a new film has been made by . The film focuses on London and is an overview of how hard it can be to listen, understand and implement action on inequalities.

The film explores how decisions made through policy, design and implementation, affect the lives of us all and how the marginalised in society are the ones who are particularly hardest hit.

This film is part of longstanding collaboration between UCL Grand Challenges and UCL Public Policy.

.


Structurally Unsound Five Years On - Reflective Workshop

How have structural inequalities in the UK evolved over the last five years? Which regions, groups and people are facing increased or multiple disadvantages? Where have there been notable successes in addressing inequalities, and how has the inequalities landscape of the UK shifted? What key lessons have been learned for universities, business, civil society, and policy makers?

These questions are at the heart of a long-standing collaboration between and which continues to build understanding across sectors and move the dial on tackling structural inequalities in the UK.Ìý

Following collaboration with the Resolution Foundation in 2019 to produce a policy commission and major report: Structurally Unsound – Exploring Inequalities: Igniting research to better inform policy – this work continues to make an impact on understanding intersectional inequalities today. Five years on, these teams recently reconvened experts drawn from academia, business, policy, and civil society, to reflect on the changed landscape of structural inequalities in the UK and discuss approaches to addressing these.

In collaboration with Pro Bono Economics, a day of compelling ‘lightning talks’ and focussed discussions explored topics including:Ìý

  • How language can shape political agendas and determine the awareness and perceived urgency of tackling structural inequalities.
  • Challenges of sustained, meaningful co-production with those who have lived experience of marginalisation.
  • The importance of viewing structural inequalities as part of deep-set poverty pandemic in the UK, rather than a ‘one-off' cost-of-living crisis.
  • Resilience and efforts to overcome disadvantages are being transferred from institutions to individuals.
  • The possibilities of treating crises as opportunities to build capacity for long-term change.
  • Valuing long-term relationships to ensure we are asking the right questions, and seeking the right evidence.
  • A need to reformulate pre-existing ideas around multiple disadvantage – and the data needed to better understand where the shoe really pinches.

Find out more by readingÌýtheÌý

Download Structurally Unsound report (pdf)

YouTube Widget Placeholder

Abstract
Inequalities are deeply embedded in our society, permeating throughout our social structures and institutions. Legislative responses that outlaw discriminatory behaviours and promote positive change are an essential part of the battle, but the structural nature of horizontal inequalities (that is, those that apply to entire groups such as women, disabled people, LGBT individuals, and people of colour rather than just at the individual level) mean that they are not necessarily sufficient.ÌýThat is particularly the case once we account for additional complications associated with the intersection of various forms of horizontal inequality. The inequalities faced by women of colour are not simply those faced by white women with a racial element ‘added on’: theyÌýare fundamentally different.Ìý

Making further progress rests, as ever, on securing political and social will for change. But it rests too on further developing the evidence base – both in terms of more accurately capturing the nuance of the problem statement, and better understanding what works when it comes to policy interventions. It is that goal which this project has pursued. Over the course of nine months, UCL and the Resolution Foundation have convened a series of roundtables and undertaken interviews with research and policy experts from a range of disciplines, policy areas, sectors and locations. Five cross‑cutting themes have emerged that we believe warrant consideration by all members of the research and policymaking communities that want to more effectively tackle structural inequalitiesÌýin the UK:Ìý

  • Language
  • Opportunity
  • Understanding evidence
  • Voice
  • Place

We construct a deliberately technocratic list of lessons that researchers and policymakers should consider when thinking about how to better approach the study and treatment of structural inequalities. In this way, we hope to spread best practice and help plug the gaps in understanding that our expert engagement identified.

Lead Authors
Siobhan Morris, Oliver Patel, , and

With contributions from
Professor Nick Gallent,Ìý, , and

This report was undertaken in partnership between UCL’s Grand Challenge of Justice & Equality, UCL Public Policy, and theÌý.

Download Structurally Unsound report (pdf)

Ìý

Ìý

report-structure

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý