911±¬ÁÏÍø

Every member of our community will be aware of the local and international impactÌýof the Israel – Gaza crisis. No-one could fail to be shaken by human suffering on this scale. It is also hard to avoid the media coverage of troubling scenes on campusesÌýin the US and elsewhere: mass protests, which have escalated into violence inÌýplaces, resulting inÌýpoliceÌýinvolvement.

In times of intense conflict, competing claims and assumptions about theÌýresponsibilities of a university and its leadership are usually in play.Ìý

It goes without saying that our first responsibility must be to members of our staff and studentÌýcommunityÌýwhoÌýareÌýaffected by a conflict, to ensure that they have all the wellbeing and other support that they need and that we are able to provide. WeÌýmust remember that we have staff and students who have been directly affected byÌýthe Israel – Gaza crisis on both sides.Ìý

But what of our wider responsibilities? Does a university have a responsibility toÌýadopt an institutional adjudication of the rights and wrongs of this or any otherÌýconflict? Does refraining from doing so demonstrate a callous indifference to suchÌýsuffering? And what is the responsibility of the university when views about a conflict are being expressed that are deeply held by some and experienced as hurtful andÌýdiscriminatory by others?

Universities have always been places of ferment in times of historical change andÌýconflict. They are places in which the passionate exchange of ideas is core, placesÌýthat foster debate. Academic freedom and freedom of speech are central. Staff andÌýstudents want to see ideas translated into action, and activism has long been a partÌýof campus life.

In times of conflict, more than ever, this entails the need to create an environment inÌýwhich debate can be free, but also open to participation by all staff and students, and safe for scholarly activity. That is not always easy to do.ÌýI have argued in a previous message that support for academic freedom andÌýfreedom of debate requires that a university not adopt an institutional position inÌýrelation to any given issue, including an issue of armed conflict. Though this is notÌýalways an easy or a comfortable line to hold, I believe that it is crucial to maintainingÌýour foundational role as a community committed to pluralism, to the notion thatÌýpeople with very different understandings of the world, including those that someÌýmay find repugnant, can live together and even attempt to understand one another.ÌýInteresting questions have been raised as to whether this position means that weÌýought not to have formal institutional relationships with universities in countriesÌýcurrently involved in military action.

On that issue, I believe that staff and students ought to be able, as part of their academic freedom, to collaborate with scholars in any country with which it is permissible to do so under UK law and that the university ought to continue to encourage international intellectual exchange.

But the greater challenge, especially now, is to know what it means practically toÌýcreate an environment in which debate can be free, but also an environment that is open to all staff and students and safe for scholarly activity.

On the one hand, this must mean that our campus is open to protest as well as toÌýdebate. We must take all reasonable steps to ensure that protests within the law byÌýmembers of our community can take place safely, even when this may causeÌýdistress or concern for others who share different backgrounds, beliefs or views. It isÌýfor this reason that we have allowed protests, rallies and events to take place, such as the one that took place last Friday. We have also had a recentÌýoccupation of the Jeremy Bentham room.ÌýAlthough disruptive to the business of the university, and unsettling and upsetting for some members of our community, that disruption was manageable and in line withÌýour Code of Conduct on free speech. We are also aware that a small protest with tents has just gone up in the quad. We hope and expect this to be small and peaceful.

On the other hand, there are limits to what we can allow flowing from our duties toÌýencourage participation by all, and to give primacy to scholarly activity. We cannotÌýfacilitate protest that descends into hate speech, harassment or bullying. I have been horrified by some of the personal experiences of anti-semitism and IslamophobiaÌýthat are being reported by members of our university. I strongly encourage thoseÌýwho need it to reach to our student support services, or to their line managers, toÌýensure that they are receiving the support that they need. I also urge anyone whoÌýfeels that they have encountered speech or behaviour that they believe goes beyond legitimate discourse to use our channels to ensure we can takeÌýany necessary action.

Similarly, although the university must be a place that can accommodate lawfulÌýprotest by staff and students, and that must be open to the external communities that we serve, we are aware that there are external individuals and organisations who are seeking to exploit the university’s duty to allow freedom of expression, to disrupt the university’s business in the name of their cause. We cannot allow something that causes significant disruption to the running of the university and interferes with ourÌýprimary purpose as a place of learning and research.

This is why, at a time when tensions are running high on university campuses across the world, we are currently asking our staff and students to show their ID cards at the gate as a precautionary measure, and for academic visitors to do the same. This isÌýparticularly important at a time when we need to support those preparing for, orÌýsitting exams on campus.

Additionally, I urge everyone to show compassion and understanding towards oneÌýanother and to be mindful of the need to live and work together. As we navigateÌýthese challenging times, let’s continue the dialogue about what it means to remainÌýtrue to our foundational commitments to pluralism and to freedom of speech, toÌýdiversity and to engagement across those issues that divide us. And let usÌýindividually support the efforts of those who seek to bring peace everywhere.ÌýAs usual, I look forward to hearing your thoughts about how these conversationsÌýshould be handled and would encourage you to write to me atÌýpresident.provost@ucl.ac.uk.